Monday, December 19, 2011

McCann Fund Fraud And Allegations Of Paedophilia

Liar, Liar: Edward Smethurst’s claim against Tony Bennett

08 Dec
Summary: Edward Smethurst’s claim against me has been settled on the following agreed terms:a) I will pay the sum of £2,500 agreed damages to Mr Smethurst, without any formal admission of liability. Mr Smethurst has said via Carter-Ruck that he will pay this sum into the Find Madeleine Fund
b) I will in addition pay Mr Smethurst’s reasonable legal costs to date, to be assessed by the court if not agreed between me and him (see below)
c) Carter-Ruck will draw up an undertaking for me to sign which will cover the contents of anything that I may or may not publish about him in the future; the terms of that undertaking to be agreed between us.
The hearing yesterday (7 December):
Carter-Ruck had four people representing them at yesterday’s hearing, which was in Room E117, the chambers of Master Victoria McCloud. They were:
(i) Jacob Dean, barrister
(ii) Isabel Hudson, Senior Partner of Carter-Ruck
(iii) Two female assistants.
Mr Smethurst’s claim, issued by the court on 9 August 2011, was originally for £100,000 damages.
This was primarily a costs management hearing in which Carter-Ruck were asking the Master to approve their ‘costs budget’. This set out, in a series of complex tables, how they had calculated their costs to date (£28,390) and their likely future costs (£143,086.50), which totalled £171, 476.50.
Discussion about Carter-Ruck’s costs bill took up most of the 1¾ hour hearing. The Master queried the very high amount of costs in Carter-Ruck’s budget. The end result was that Carter-Ruck’s costs budget schedule, most unusually, was rejected by the Master, who ordered Carter-Ruck at their own expense to submit another one. Carter-Ruck were given leave to appeal if they wished.
The hearing opened with Jacob Dean, for Mr Smethurst, being able to make a half-hour opening summary of the case. In this address, he set out that the following legal issues to be settled in the case:
a) whether any or all of the comments I made about Mr Smethurst were justified (strictly true)
b) whether, if not justified, they were ‘fair comment’
c) what was the actual meaning of some of the words I used
d) whether I had acted promptly to remove any offending words.
He also claimed that Mr Smethurst had no control on Facebook over who became his friends on his Facebook page. That meant that I would have to have proved to the court that certain named friends of his were there as a matter of his conscious decision. Jacob Dean claimed that anyone could become Mr Smethurst’s ‘Facebook Friend’.
At the hearing the barrister produced a new application, running to several hundred more pages, with exhibits, for ‘Summary Disposal’ of the case. The application contended that I had no arguable case and that the case should be disposed of at a 1-day hearing without the matter ever going to trial. If the case had proceeded, there would have been a 1-day summary trial before a judge. If at that hearing the judge thought that I had an arguable case, the matter would have been set down for a 3-day trial at which all the legal arguments mentioned above would have been considered.
The Master was especially interested in the following aspects of the matter:
a) whether or not I had promptly removed any offending material
b) whether or not Mr Smethurst had followed the Pre-Action Protocol on Defamation, which requires libel claimants to give potential defendants an opportunity to remove any allegedly libellous publications. The Protocol sets out quite clearly that court action should be ‘a last resort’
c) whether or not Mr Smethurst should have issued proceedings on 9 August when I had met all the demands of Carter-Ruck’s initial two letters of 4 August
d) whether Mr Smethurst’s claim for £100,000 damages was ‘proportional’: i.e. whether such a large claim was reasonable in respect of comments made on a small internet forum and which were removed on request
e) whether the steps taken in the proceedings to date by Carter-Ruck were proportionate, having regard in particular to my prompt removal of any offending material.
At the conclusion of the case, the Master said that she was “fully seized of all the issues relating to the need for claimants to follow the pre-Action Protocol and as to proportionality”.
In terms, this may well mean that a large part of Mr Smethurst’s costs claim may be disallowed by the court.
Once a libel claim has been issued, and bearing in mind the gross inequality of resources in this case, tough choices have to be made. My choice was to settle on the most favourable terms that I could agree.
Tony Bennett

Jacob Dean is talking out of his arse, Smethurst accepted friend requests from Ben Murphy and James Halley. Unless of course we are to believe that his Facebook account was hacked!  Anyone who uses Facebook will know that friend requests have to be accepted by those one wishes to befriend before they will be listed as a Facebook friend of that particular person.

Murphy and Halley are Facebook friends of Smethurst. Both are also Facebook friends of Greg Bailey aka Greg ‘the groomer’ Bailey.

Smethurst is fan of the the Elephant and Castle pub in Rochdale, as is his Facebook friend Halley.

Murphy is a fan of Fisting; a sexual activity that involves inserting a hand into the vagina or rectum. Once insertion is complete, the fingers either naturally clench into a fist or remain straight. In more vigorous forms of fisting, such as “punching”, a fully clenched fist may be inserted and withdrawn slowly. Fisting may be performed with or without a partner. Given that Murphy is also a fan of ‘cock sauce’, I suspect he prefers to receive fists rather than takeHe was also at one time a fan of ‘bestiality’ – the illegal practice of sex between man and beast. However, It is not know if Murphy is a practicing zoophile.

Halley is a fan of ‘drugs’ and ‘crack’….he also appears to be interested in having a ‘boob job’!

A brief exchange between Smethurst’s Facebook friend Halley and Greg ‘the groomer’ Bailey retrieved from Facebook in 2009

“i reckon every time you log on to facebook a child gets groomed for sex ! Greg the Groomer
July 15 at 2:43pm Greg Bailey: Halley I’m not the one on the register, you however are a fully registered sex pest was your bid to buy neverland ranch successful or are you still going to be hanging around outside toddler groups?
July 15 at 2:46pm James Halley you are the worst of the sex offenders, the type that trawls the internet pretending to be a fellow six year old before arranging to meet up behind the rugby club for “a chat”. at least a jacko built an amusement park to keep them happy while he fingered them !
July 15 at 2:51pm”
Halley shes a bit old for you aint she ? i thought the worst sexually transmitted disease you have had before was getting hundreds and thousands stuck under your foreskin from offering a young boy a “lick of your special lolly”
July 17 at 7:35pmGreg Bailey nah mate she cleans my shoes and I get a suck free with it! as for the hundreds and thousands I read in the paper that, that trick is known in pedo circles as the halley. any idea why?
July 17 at 7:39pm James Halley i got it from a forum on, there is link for it on the Mothercare website
July 17 at 7:41pm Greg Bailey I heard about that site it apparently was started by some midget with a beard because he was jealous of a handsome man taking all his porn away!
July 17 at 7:43pm James Halley she did start the site off and i must admit your mum seemed a little upset about loosing her usual clients, but i guarantee she thinks your far from handsome . . . .your dad on the other hand thinks you one of the prettiest boys around

If Smethurst is lacking in technological knowledge (snigger) and unable to figure out how to ‘unfriend’ people on Facebook, he might like to ask his eldest daughter for a bit of help….she seems au fait with the ‘unfriending’ process; she has recently ditched the ‘fisting’ fanatic, and suspected zoophile, Murphy.

A late addition, hat tip to PeterMac, Facebook’s instructions on adding friends
“Adding friends
How do I add a friend?
Search for your friend’s profile (timeline) using the search bar at the top of any Facebook page. Find the person you know and click on the Add as Friend button to the right of their name.

A friend request will be sent to that person. Once they confirm that they actually are friends with you, they will show up on your list of Facebook friends [and vice versa].
Please note that privacy settings may limit your ability to see the “Add as Friend” link for some users.”

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

#Paedophile in #Goverment :Public servant on 'child sex' charges - but we're barred from telling you anything about him

He has appeared in court on charges believed to be connected to child-sex offences under a draconian restriction which means nothing can be said about him.
The Mail on Sunday is aware of his job but cannot disclose any information about the man, who can be referred to only as ‘X’.

Bizarrely, a second defendant in the case has not been granted anonymity.

The concealment of the identity of the public servant is believed to be an unprecedented move in a criminal case of this kind.

John Venables
Robert Thompson
Restrictions have been used in other cases like those of child-killers Jon Venables and Robert Thompson - the boys were convicted of murdering toddler James Bulger
It is not known on what basis he was granted anonymity.

Other restrictions have been used to conceal the identity of child-killer Mary Bell, and Jon Venables and Robert Thompson – the boys convicted of murdering toddler James Bulger.
In these cases, however, there were full and open trials and anonymity was imposed only after court proceedings had concluded.

This time, the restriction has been imposed before any trial, and, unusually, for only one of the defendants.

However, there is deep concern in legal circles about
the increasing imposition of restrictions on reporting and the creeping spread of secret justice.

This case is bound to cause particular controversy because of the man’s job and the seriousness of the charges against him.

There has been increasing concern during the past year about the super-injunctions that have been used in a number of high-profile privacy cases, often brought by highly paid footballers and other celebrities in an attempt to save themselves from embarrassment after extra-marital affairs.


Super-injunctions are so far-reaching that the media are prohibited from even revealing their existence.

The man, who is understood to be in his mid-30s, is in custody after being arrested in the past few months.

He and his co-accused are understood to be facing a total of up to 70 charges. ‘X’ appeared before magistrates in December and is due to make another pre-trial appearance at a Crown Court later this week.
We can only refer to him as ‘X’ for legal reasons.

The case is being handled by the Crown Prosecution Service but a CPS lawyer refused to talk to a Mail on Sunday reporter yesterday.

The Ministry of Justice said it held no information about the case.
The police force leading the inquiry initially said it would provide this newspaper
with information about the charges facing the two men, but then failed to return our calls.

Read more:

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Bent cops !

This section, and it is huge, looks at cases, dirty cops and what the Police do not like you to see about themselves.
I will not bore you with their claims of unfairness on my part and the denials they continually issue to cover up their malpractice.  They are at the moment enjoying mass coverage on TV programmes showing how wonderful they are, but some time ago we applied to a commercial TV station to present them with a show on ' corruption in the police force ' it was turned down.  Firstly they gave the reason it was bad for business, then on the grounds it would sour relations.  It also came about that the police would only take part if they could have a script and cases they were willing to discuss (we would be forbidden to ask anything they did not like or unexpectedly put to them of an embarrassing nature)  We said no, as this would not get a proper response on air especially to cases they would prefer not to discuss.  So they have declined in favour of the image they prefer to be fed to the public, the propaganda and the lie they perpetuate like the Judiciary and Lawyers.  It appears that ' unaccountability ' wins.
There is so much material to cover and volumes already compiled that we will first begin with recent news items such as the 742 Police Officers arrested and another item by the Liberal Democrats announcing that 1,063 police officers have criminal records and are serving officers in the police.  This might shock, but it is a fact the tip of the iceberg and not a full picture of police corruption --- it goes much deeper than those figures and encompasses all ranks -- as you will see if you go to ' The Bent Cops' list, which is just a snapshot of what we have in our files.
We begin with THE BRIBERY SCANDAL OF 1877.  Although the Police Force was in it's formative years and malpractice was a regular event, the conviction of four senior officers for taking bribes caused the public to doubt the integrity of a force that should have been law abiding.  Paymaster and tycoon, a man called Benson, paid the officers to inform him of raids and if necessary, make evidence disappear.
Benson was an ingenious swindler.  He teamed up with 'racing swindler ' William Kurr and together they issued ' Le-Sport ' which included many references to the wealthy Mr. Yonge who lived in a mansion on Shanklin, the Isle-of-Wight.  Many bookies suspected Yonge and the unusual large winnings at the race course.  Benson knew Yonge personally.  Yonge was a trickster and he chose victim Comtesse de Goncourt for a swindle acting as the betting agent using an alias.  Madame de Goncourt invested £10,000, and that was the last she saw of it.  William Kurr enlisted Chief Inspector John Meiklejohn and paid him not to investigate or derail investigations into previous swindles.  Second police officer Chief Inspector Nathaniel Druscovich was in financial difficulties, Meiklejohn introduced him to Kurr, who now had two cops on his payroll, this was soon followed by a third cop - Chief Inspector William Palmer.  Meiklejohn warned Benson and Kurr that nosey cop Chief Inspector Clarke was getting ready to pounce.  Yonge entered the plan, and got Clarke to visit him on the Isle - of - Wight.  He told Clarke he had information.  This turned later and Yonge said he'd paid £50 to Clarke.  Clarke was trapped, he'd been to Yonge's several times on invites - they were both brother freemasons.  A villain, Walters also said he had bribed Clarke and had a letter proving it.  All four cops ended up on trial along with Benson and William Kurr (plus a lawyer).  Wealthy businessman and Freemason Yonge escaped, he was too powerful to bring down.

From this beginning, the police were never able to shake off corruption, its smell never escaped the corridors of power even though some introduced 'sweeping' and 'special teams' to eradicate it  --- they were not successful, and never have been.  All such investigations have been 'cosmetic' and ' a publicity stunt' in order to allay public fears.  Its success lies in honesty and accountability, and that cannot be achieved even now.

THE 1960's and an emerging pattern of corruption in the police.
1963 saw the sensational trial of the corrupt and vicious career of Detective Sergeant Harry Challenor.  The papers centred on the madness he showed before going on trial and this helped to cloud many truths of certain squads.  The convenience of this state helped other bent cops and the public were led to believe that he was just ' one rotten apple.'
DETECTIVE SGT CHALLENOR was perceived as a paranoid schizophrenic, and termed as ' a bullying and treacherous policeman' (as they would have us believe?). But there were undeniable suspicions the top brass used smear campaigns to full use, in order to throw off and deflect suspicion on themselves and other police officers. It was obviously better to do this than allow the public to believe there may be widespread corruption in the force -- but this would have been so if the public had been aware of three other officers on trial with him were being sent to jail for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The Press were actively if not covertly, encouraged to concentrate their stories on Challenor -- and unfortunately -- they did, and the three other convicted officers quietly left the court for a journey to prison by the back-door so-to-speak. Amid the furore of ' a crazy cop' little was said or printed about the police manipulating and twisting evidence to get convictions -- using criminal records on other people, who were particularly vulnerable, to beef up a thin case when they were quite aware they lacked real evidence.
1969 saw enquiries into the Lancashire Drugs Squad and six detectives were committed for trial.
THREE ENQUIRIES were going at once.
Two Senior Officers were arrested - Commander Wallace Virgo and Commander Kenneth Drury.
1973 saw Deputy Assistant Commissioner Gilbert Kelland whose inquiry led to 20 officers being dismissed.
After appointing Detective Chief Superintendent Bill Moody, Jimmy Humphreys a major pornographer was arrested.  40 officers were arrested after Humphreys Diary was found.
1976 - After police officers from the Obscene Publications Squad were seen to be too friendly with ' the dirty books brigade ' 15 police officers of Drugs and Pornography went to trial.

We now come forward to OPERATION COUNTRYMAN of 1971 to 1977.  This was the biggest investigation into police corruption ever mounted, It was flawed from the start, and was headed by different Investigators.  They found police uncooperative, and police officers being on leave when they were due to be interviewed.  Some were being tipped off and others left.  Well over 100 police were in the frame, but the Government pulled the funding and it collapsed before a conclusion could be reached.
During the four years Sir Robert Mark held the position of Police commissioner, 478 police officers left following, or in anticipation of criminal proceedings.
THE ROTTEN ORCHARD - a book by criminal John Mc Vicar was about to see the light of day.  It was written in conjunction with Laurie Cork, an ex-flying Squad member.  McVicar wanted to tape record his memoirs involving bent cops and Cork was helping substantiate incidents.  Things fell apart between them when Cork found out McVicar had been recording with a second tape recorder strapped to his ankle.  Cork would cease the accounts of police misconduct on the main tape recorder when it became too personal, and that's when McVicar turned on the secret tape recorder.  Cork obtained an injunction on the publishing of the book when he saw extracts published in the Daily Express.   The book was never published?
One would have thought these events should have changed police actions, and that they had learnt from them.  But no,, they got better at it, and it was not just the City of London Police, Manchester Police, the West Midlands Crime Squad would be the next big story in Police Corruption.  The disease was spreading throughout the whole police organisation.  As one retired officer told me, and he wasn't clean either,  ' if two or three officers are nicked in a sting, there are dozens of others who knew about it and turned a blind eye.  This idea about one bent officer is ludicrous, the others get away with it because of a lack of evidence, and they know it.'

' The Corruption Investigations of police in 1998 '
43 POLICE FORCES THROUGHOUT THE UK HAD OFFICERS FACING DISHONESTY CHARGES AND CORRUPTION - as stated in a 'TIMES SURVEY ' and the Home Secretary at the time - Jack Straw - said this alarming situation of crooked police posed a great risk to justice.  Many of the charges concerned drugs, misuse of police information, perverting the course of justice and assaults.  The survey revealed that it just didn't occur at constable level with a few sergeants, it also mentioned superintendents, chief inspectors and high ranking detectives.  In the light of this they said a new unit was to be formed called CIB3, and that would be assigned to root out corruption.  Ten years on -- and there has been no significant cases as a result of these findings -- and are we surprised? NO.

' The mystery surrounding the killing of Blair Peach by police '
IN 1979 TEACHER  AND PROTESTOR BLAIR PEACH WAS KILLED BY POLICE UNLAWFULLY.  No police officer was charged with his death and the whole affair has been kept a secret for thirty years.  The Met Police say that the facts will be revealed soon, but we doubt that very much.  Blair Peach was murdered in Southall at the hands of the SPECIAL PATROL GROUP ---( they were involved in the beating up of the Holloway boys and thirty officers refused to give information regarding corrupt officers).  One man in charge -- Inspector Alan Murray was blamed for the circumstances in which several un-named officers clubbed the man to death.  He claims to this day it was too confusing at the time and denies involvement.  He admits people were assaulted and thrown down flights of stairs by his officers and regrets this.  The DPP now CPS said no to prosecuting any officers at the time and covered the incident in a 'secrecy tag' and files have been held in secrecy until now - thirty years after the event.
APRIL 2010  - It has now been officially revealed that an unidentified police officer did kill Blair Peach despite the many denials, and that many police officers on that day and involved lied about their accounts of what happened in order to cover-up the incident.

' The Guildford Four Case '
This case was notorious in that it resulted in a huge payout for the four who were jailed for a total of 15 years based upon lies and dishonesty of the police.  Three detectives were sent to jail for conspiring to pervert the course of justice:  CHIEF INSPECTOR THOMAS STYLE, POLICE SERGEANT JOHN DONALDSON and CONSTABLE VERNON ATTWELL.  To say or pretend these officers acted alone is absurd, but that's what the police want you to believe. 
' Police and the Climbie Case '
Six Police Officers faced disciplinary proceedings for neglect of duty.  The six worked in the Child Protection Unit at Brent and Haringey, London.  The blame for mishandling the case mainly fell on the junior officers, and resulted in the senior officers able to comfortably sidestep issues.

' The James Ashley Case and Police ' - The Sussex Cops
The un-armed Mr. Ashley was killed by Police Constable Sherwood of the East Sussex Constabulary in Hastings.  The Police Squad were on a drugs raid, but none were found.  Pc. Sherwood got off all charges and three senior officers walked away too.  Charges were dropped with the explanation ' There are wider corporate laws to consider ?'
' Sussex Officer is charged with manslaughter '
POLICE CONSTABLE CHRISTOPHER SHERWOOD was charged over the fatal shooting of a man in Hastings after a raid on a house.  The incident sparked fury and led to the suspension of Police Chief Paul Whitehouse.
FOUR OTHER POLICE OFFICERS were charged with misconduct in public office relating to the shooting incident.

The Sussex Police were also involved in an incident when two Police Constables beat up a Michael Smith and were withdrawn from duty; again in Hastings.
MAN TO SUE SUSSEX POLICE after being acquitted of charges - Russell Bishop spent a year in jail due to police evidence launched against him at ' The Babes in the Wood Trial'  It took a jury just ten minutes to find him not guilty at his trial.  He now plans to sue The Sussex Police for wrongful Arrest and Malicious Prosecution.
Another case involving the Sussex Police came to light when they handcuffed and detained Gregory Nash over a £20 unpaid fine.   He was taken by Chichester Police to Dover in a police vehicle and put in a cell until the fine was paid.  The cost to taxpayers was huge.  'Wasting Police Time comes to mind, and they certainly did.
Another Sussex Police Incident involved a young man who was stopped 39 times in one year.  One officer even asked him after they had pulled him over ' Are you wanted?'
162 complaints of assault were lodged against the Sussex police according to a report in July 2008.
SUSSEX - Worthing Police, topped the list of shame in respect of police misconduct in 2008, since the year 2005 they have increased with allegations of oppressive behaviour and failures in duty.  The police attempted to justify this with the following comments ' we believe that a great deal of the increase is attributable to changes in the way we record complaints in Sussex -- this doesn't mean we received the highest number of complaints out of all the forces.'
2006 - 428 COMPLAINTS,  2007 - 774 COMPLAINTS and another rise in 2008.
SUSSEX POLICE came in for more criticism (which they seem to brush aside lightly these days) over the fact during police chases they killed people for a second time within a week.  A pensioner was fatally wounded during a police chase in Copthorne, West Sussex.  A man from Brighton died in Lancing whilst being pursued by the cops.  Although these incidents have been reported to the IPCC do not expect much of a result or any prosecutions of officers --- it rarely happens.
SUSSEX POLICE TO BE SUED - Beauty Queen Linda Watson approached lawyers in a bid to sue the Sussex Police for £1million in damages following the botched investigation into the murder of her wealthy husband - when they accuse her of hiring a hitman in a malicious prosecution.  After walking free from the Old Bailey, she vowed to sue police for all the trouble they had caused plus the distress.
The Sussex Constabulary
A recent look at the Sussex Police Authority handout --- newspaper goes way too far in promoting the force as being highly successful.  Considering we have reported on the complaints issue in that they top the league, one can see that they ignore this completely and pretend that corruption does not exist within the force despite the many cases we have cited so far.
' Sussex Cop in Money-laundering case '
POLICEMAN DARREN GRAVEMARK is currently on trial concerning a matter of drugs and money laundering it was said on a recent news report.  It appears that his money-laundering activities concern his drugs partner and at the moment the SUSSEX POLICE are remaining silent about this matter.
SUSSEX COPS IN ASSAULT COVER-UP --- Five cops including a Sergeant were moved to other duties after an assault on a man went wrong. The Police were not named and they refused to discuss the case to reporters, only that it appears to have been over a motoring incident.  Since the incident there has been a 'close down of all information' and the CPS were unwilling to provide any further information.
' West Sussex Cops in assault attack '
TWO WEST SUSSEX POLICEMEN -- Constable Andrew Watson and Constable Iain Pearce were seen beating up a man who was a suspect thief -- the witness was a trainee police constable Darren Nagle who was shocked to see colleagues carrying out the assault.
West Sussex cops have been told they will face disciplinary action over accepting free burgers from a MacDonald's restaurant.  The Deputy Chief Constable Mark Jordan stated that it destroyed an officer's integrity and could possibly be seen by the public as a sort of bribe for any possible favours that may arise out of this situation.  Apart from that he said it broke the force's disciplinary code that forbids accepting gratuities without the proper consent.
More rubbish was doled out yet again via the Chichester News about falling crime rates in Sussex in their July to August free paper.  As we once stated in RELATED TOPICS newpaper reporters are not exactly honest or accurate as said by Nick Davies in his damning investigation into the newspaper industry - in his book 'Flat Earth News' which The Chichester News ought to read sometime.  Crime figures from a force that came out as the worst and most often complained about Constabulary (which can be seen on this page) have to be viewed as a lie or fiction created by them in the face of rising attacks and crime in East and West Sussex in general.
THREE COPS IN FATAL SHOOTING WALK FREE  --- SUPERINTENDENT CHRIS BURTON, INSPECTOR KEVIN FRENCH and INSPECTOR CHRISTOPHER SIGGS of the Sussex Constabulary were originally suspended and charged with the manslaughter of James Ashley in St. Leonards, near Hastings.  A fourth officer had already been suspended -- POLICE CONSTABLE CHRIS SHERWOOD.  A whitewash was claimed as these officers walked away without any charge.  Some sources say the investigation was hampered by senior legal chiefs and the Chief Constable, who remarkably left his post in a resignation.
SUSSEX COPS ISSUE LIE TO GO IN AND TAKE JAMES ASHLEY -- Just before the shooting police made references and statements to the fact they went to Ashley's residence on the suspicion he stabbed a person, but it emerged later in the inquiry that ' there was no evidence to indicate that Mr.Ashley had carried out the stabbing referred to ' and this was said by the investigation officer Tony Williams who claimed he'd been aware of various references which either stated or implied this was so.
MAN TO SUE SUSSEX COPS after horrific swoop when Sussex Police in Chichester fully armed with automatic pistols mistook visitor martin Kelly to be an armed robber. Martin, a visitor from the West Midlands attending a christening was thrown to the ground after leaving a pub in Chichester and subsequently handcuffed.  When it was eventually discovered they had made a mistake, they didn't even apologise said Martin who is going to sue for compensation.
' Assault Officer to be Sentenced '
SUSSEX POLICE OFFICER CARL CHIVERALL was found guilty of Common Assault when he appeared at Haywards Heath Magistrates Court.  The Officer was on duty with the Sussex Roads Policing Unit at Polegate. He is due back in court at Crawley Magistrates in September to be sentenced.
ABUSE INSPECTOR IS REPORTED -- Sussex Cop DETECTIVE INSPECTOR KEVIN MOORE found himself in trouble when he flew into a rage and hurled abuse at a constable after he sent off four members of his team at a soccer match.  The Detective Chairman of Eastbourne Town was reported for bringing the game into disrepute and using foul language and abuse. 
' Police pay damages to Football Manager after raid '
CHICHESTER POLICE (SUSSEX CONSTABULARY) paid £1,000 to Harry Redknapp the Portsmouth Football Manager after a dawn raid on his home.  The Judge ruled the raid as unlawful and were ordered to pay £10,000 costs along with the settlement.
SUSSEX WOMAN COP TIPS OFF SUSPECT -- Woman Police Constable Grania Hale of Newbury is to appear before Maidstone Crown Court on Misconduct Charges. She was a member of the Sussex Police Haywards Heath Neighbourhood Response Team. She has been suspended and cannot enter East or West Sussex in her bail conditions. It is stated that she tipped off a suspect about a police raid.
' Shoplifting charge Detective commits suicide '
DETECTIVE CHIEF INSPECTOR JIM TORBET of the SUSSEX POLICE was found dead just hours before he was due to answer bail in connection with the theft of wine from a supermarket.  Both he and colleague CHIEF INSPECTOR SHARON ROWE were to appear on the theft charges. 
It is interesting to note that this case fizzled out, making the police very happy -- as no further disclosures were made and the truth was as usual; concealed and hidden from the public.

Monday, September 5, 2011

'Blair covering up paedophile scandal?'

While British Prime Minister Tony Blair is under criminal suspicion in the "honours-for-cash" scandal that has rocked his Labour government, we have been told that there is an even more explosive scandal that Blair, up to now, has managed to hide behind the draconian British policy of issuing "D-Notices," government orders that prohibit the British media from reporting on certain "national security" cases.

In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and paedophiles run by Britain's National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulted in 7,250 suspects being identified in the United Kingdom alone. Some 1850 people were criminally charged in the case and there were 1451 convictions. Almost 500 people were interviewed "under caution" by police, meaning they were suspects. Some 900 individuals remain under investigation. In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair's government.

However, Blair issued a D-Notice, resulting in a gag order on the press from publishing any details of the investigation. Blair cited the impending war in Iraq as a reason for the D-Notice. Police also discovered links between British Labour government paedophile suspects and the trafficking of children for purposes of prostitution from Belgium and Portugal (including young boys from the Casa Pia orphanage in Portugal).

Tony Blair: stifling investigations of paedophiles in his Labour government.

In the United States, Operation Ore's counterpart was Operation Avalanche. However, U.S. authorities only charged 100 people out of 35,000 investigated. The international paedophile investigation began when Dallas police and the US Postal Inspection Service raided the offices of Landslide Productions of Fort Worth, Texas and confiscated records on thousands of people around the world who were child pornography customers of the firm. Landslide's halcyon days as a Fort Worth-based international online marketplace of kiddie porn was during the term of Texas Governor George W. Bush.

WMR has learned that the Bush administration, like that of Blair, is rife with paedophiles in top positions. The paedophile network also extends to the U.S. defense industry, particularly some of the companies that have been involved in the sexual abuse of minors at overt and covert U.S. prisons in Abu Ghraib, Iraq; Guantanamo, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Thailand, and now, at three prisons in Ethiopia.

Source: Wayne Madsen
Related: Blackout in Britain - Alleged Pedophiles Helm Blair's War Room

Friday, August 5, 2011

Edward Smethurst a member on the board of directors of the McCanns Limited Company disguised as a FUND.

Those who visit this site are interested in Operation Ore. This thread and the mystery of what happened to Madeleine McCann makes for very disturbing reading, particularly when one thinks of the type of people the McCanns mix with !

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Don't look now :In the sordid world of child abuse, fantasy and reality are perilously intertwined

This piece starts inside a taxi parked near the Mumtaz restaurant in Baker Street, one evening in the early Seventies. There are five people inside, and one of them, a middle-aged celebrity, looks over to a 16-year-old boy sitting opposite, rolls his famous eyes, and says, 'I think Big John has the hots for somebody here, and my guess,' he pauses, and then points, 'is that it's you.'
The 'you' was me. A boy from school who had got a job as a part-time cleaner in the flat of the celebrity, and with the job came the invitation to be in the audience to watch a famous show being recorded at BBC Television Centre. He chose me. After the recording it was off to Baker Street with one of the stars and some of his friends, including Big John.

What did I feel? Bewildered. This had never happened to me before. Embarrassed. Repelled. Big John was not an attractive man, and he certainly was big. Scared. I wasn't quite sure how I would get home if I suddenly had to decamp (so to speak) from the cab. Fortunately the issue wasn't pressed. My face had registered all that it needed to - the taxi dropped me at the end of my road and sped off.

Ah, and I felt something else too, which is much harder to admit. I was very slightly (very, very slightly) flattered and intrigued. Flattered to be found attractive even by so dubious a catch as Big John, and quite intrigued as to what he would have done to me had I smiled at him, and had the taxi (as I suppose it would) taken us on to his flat. And what would I have done had the celebrity propositioned me on his own behalf? The same, I think. If the celebrity had been a woman? If Big John had been Big Johanna? If I'd been drunk? If they had all been more persistent?

What I'm saying is that I feel and felt some ambivalence, even in that situation, where the prospect was some form of sex with an ugly old man. (Can I really be writing this?) And that that ambivalence is, I would guess, far more a part of our sexual condition that we ever like to admit.

A year or two earlier, I had had a series of minor crushes on younger boys who were more conventionally handsome than me (admittedly a wide field). I never acted upon any of them, but I can just about recall the attraction. So the merest imprint remains, of something that I felt at 13 or 14.

Right now there is no public space for ambivalence. One newspaper spoke yesterday of 10,000 more names being on 'a new FBI list of British paedophiles' - ie, people who had, like Pete Townshend, used their credit cards to access pornography depicting children naked or being abused. In the same way, other celebrities are lumped in with paedophiles, and subjected to reputation-lynching, because they are being investigated for having sex with 15-year-old boys 30 years ago.

Here comes the necessary disclaimer. The sexual abuse of a child is a uniquely horrible crime, because it destroys the child's sense of him or herself and undermines the capacity for trust. The fact that this crime is usually carried out by a parent or a trusted adult, makes the damage worse.

But two aspects of the current panic worry me. The first is that, like judges and the courts, I feel that circumstances can alter cases; had I decided to let Big John have his wicked way with me, I don't really think that he would have deserved prosecution.

The second is that, no matter how often I turn this one round in my head, I cannot quite accept that thinking is the same as doing. I just don't agree that looking at child porn on the net is a similar order of crime to creating the abuse and then photographing it, or even to distributing it.

I understand the arguments. If you reward an abuser then you are encouraging the crime. In the film The Accused (based, I believe, on a true story), a woman successfully prosecuted several men who had egged on other men to rape her in a bar poolroom. And that is good enough reason for making it illegal to pay for internet child porn. But it is a step beyond that to argue that those who do pay are either paedophiles or sex offenders, or that they should be humiliated or imprisoned as if they were. We do not know what they are, just as we don't always know what we are.

That's because there's something else here too. The advent of the internet and the ubiquity of computers have shortened the distance between fantasy and its expression. This is a very dramatic change. It's not just about being able to access pictures and stories that once were the territory only of seedy sex-shops (though that's part of it), or even the realisation that there are people out there who are as weird as you may be. It is the ability, in the most unrestricted way, to explore simultaneously the inner and the outer world.
It is easy to see that this search can be motivated as much by a strange curiosity as by a desire for arousal or release. Some 'perversions' such as shoe fetishism have always existed and are relatively straightforward, but others are not. These, however, are now imaginable and available. It surely can only be in the age of the web that you could look up the phrase 'goat-fisting' and get 81 references. And if you follow them up, are you a goat-fister? I believe that some of those who have sent their credit card details off to child-porn providers have simply lost sight of themselves and of reality, and are actually no more likely to abuse children than any of the rest of us.

And there are big dangers in trying to look inside other peoples' heads. In 2001 Brian Dalton of Columbus, Ohio, got 10 years after his probation officer found a diary detailing his (admittedly horrible) fantasies about sex with kids. But they were fantasies, and Dalton was not trying to sell or distribute them. Similarly I worried about prosecuting people who click on dodgy photographs and, by so doing, download them onto their computers.

This is a plea for intelligence, not inaction. The fact that many people are in some way interested in children in a sexual context, is not a surprise to the psycho-analytical community. But they will not, routinely, be described as paedophiles, let alone as 'sick, twisted, perverts'. In any case, the hard-core active paedophiles probably never give out their credit card details, but instead exchange encrypted messages and pictures through hard-to-trace aliases and bogus websites. Such paedophiles, who need to be (and are) exceptionally devious and committed to their perversion, must be aware that overt internet child-porn is the biggest aid that law enforcement and child protection authorities have ever had. So I am in favour of spying on suspect sites and people, and doing everything possible to follow child-porn to its source - real children really being violated - and banging up those heartless, damaged bastards who create it.

But lets not pretend that, somehow, we have this sussed. Strangely I trust the police to act sensibly (because, like the analysts, they've seen it all): it's the rest of us I worry about. We're very anxious, a lot of the time, to act as though sexuality was a straight line from adolescent masturbation, via looking at nude pictures, to years of intermittent intercourse and eventually death. And we still get dangerously upset when there's evidence that it just isn't so.

Will the Sex Offenders’ Register “Review Mechanism” breach human rights law?

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

TWITTER: Police probe child abuse images ...

Kit Cunningham: My friend, my priest a paedophile .

Father Kit Cunningham
Father Kit Cunningham abused schoolchildren in his care at Soni, Tanzania. Photograph: Mike Pattison
All journalists like seeing their articles discussed on television, even when they're being challenged, but the sight of John Poppleton holding a copy of an obituary I wrote earlier this year for the Guardian made me feel profoundly ashamed.

The subject was Father Kit Cunningham, the Catholic priest who had married us, baptised my son (who shares his Christian name) and was a family friend for 20 years. "A Technicolor eccentric, and widely loved as a consequence," the obituary read.

"I find this," Poppleton said, brandishing the newspaper cutting to camera as if it were contaminated, "offensive. This priest was a monster."

Poppleton had been repeatedly sexually abused as a young boy by Fr Kit, an experience that he says "broke me down and broke my spirit". The abuse took place at St Michael's, Soni, in the 1960s, in what was then Tanganyika, now Tanzania. Four of the priests who taught there, all members of the Rosminian order, and including Fr Kit, perpetrated physical and sexual abuse that made this boarding school, according to Poppleton, "a loveless, violent and sad hellhole" more

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Paedophilia in the Catholic Church

My 28 year battle against the paedophile priests.

John Meagher talks to the US attorney who’s bringing his campaign to Ireland
Saturday February 12 2011 Irish Independent

In 1983, Jeff Anderson was just another lawyer working in St Paul, Minnesota. Then, by chance, the 35-year-old’s career — and life — changed forever when a man walked into his office saying he had been abused by a priest.

Soon after taking on the case, Anderson realised the problem was much greater than he had first imagined. It wasn’t just a paedophile priest who was culpable, but also senior bishops who had conspired to cover up the abuse. He promptly sued the Archdiocese of Minneapolis and St Paul.

The bishops responded with $1m to settle the matter out of court, but Anderson’s client refused. And so began a landmark case which drew the attention of the US media to clerical abuse for the first time. He eventually won the case and the floodgates opened.

“Hundreds of survivors of clerical abuse who had been afraid to come forward finally spoke up,” he says, speaking to Weekend Review from his office in St Paul. “Many thought they had been the only ones who had suffered abuse at the hands of priests, and that case — and subsequent cases — showed that it was much more common than they had thought.”... read more

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Portsmouth City Council. Lib.Dem. MP Mike Hancock accused of being a paedohpile...

Paedophiles and the powerful...

Harriet Harmen wanted pornographic pictures of children made legal.


Hariett Harmen was not a child, she was the legal officer in an organisation that openly had paedophile groups affiliated to it and campaigned on their behalf. She wanted pornographic pictures of children made legal. What kind of sick minded individual would want to do that? She only left the NCCL when she was elected as a Labour party MP. The Labour party selected her as a candidate in spite of her paedophile sympathies. What kind of sick party is that?

The Paedophile Information Exchange only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982, the same year that Harriet Harman left her NCCL post to become Member of Parliament for Peckham.

NCCL people were earlier involved in keeping the name of an NCCL council-member, Jonathan Walters, out of the People newspaper when it ran an exposé of Paedophile Action for Liberation, of which he was secretary, in 1975. The People still ran the story, but Walters was not named.

Harman was not the only Labour high flyer running the National Council of Civil Liberties at the time all this was going on.

The Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt MP a recent Labour Secretary of State for Health, became General Secretary of NCCL in 1974. The very next year, 1975, NCCL invited the Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for Liberation to affiliate. In the year after, 1976, the now-notorious paedophile Tom O'Carroll was invited to address the NCCL conference, which promptly voted to 'deplore' the use of chemical castration treatments for paedophiles.

Also in 1975, Patricia Hewitt joined the Campaign for Homosexual Equality, as a 'straight', in the same year that Keith Hose of the Paedophile Information Exchange addressed its second annual conference. Hose moved a motion of censure on the conference organising committee for 'relegating paedophilia to ancillary status in conference.' The motion was seconded by Trevor Locke, who just happened to be a member of the Executive Council of the NCCL. 'An awareness and acceptance of the sexuality of children is an essential part of the liberation of the young homosexual,' the motion went on. It was duly passed.

Jack Dromey, whom Harriet Harman married in 1982, and has been Treasurer of the Labour Party, was also involved with the NCCL. He served on its Executive Committee from 1970 to 1979, so he was there when the decision to invite the two paedophile groups to affiliate was made. NCCL also set up a gay rights sub-committee at the same time, members of which included prominent paedophiles Peter Bremner (alias Roger Nash), Michael Burbidge, Keith Hose and Tom O'Carroll.

This is far worse than any expenses claim story. This goes to the root of basic decency. Paedophile related crime is the most heinous involving abuse, torture or even death of children, some of which is filmed for paedophiles to view over the internet. That Labour party members, cover up or are apologists for such activity is indicative of their depravity.

Labour party as their natural home:

April 2009 A former Wigan councillor who downloaded child porn and had a gun and ammunition in his safe was jailed for six years. A court heard that Joseph Shaw's offending came to light after his daughter found the indecent images on his computer. Liverpool Crown Court heard that Shaw had been a Labour councillor for Wigan West for three years and also a member of the Greater Manchester Transport Authority,

Labour Councillor (Stoke/Staffordshire), Michael Barnes, put forward a motion in July 2004 to change the constitution of Stoke-on-Trent Council. The proposed amendments were designed to prevent the City’s two British National Party councillors from chairing any committees, so as to `protect` the good citizens of Stoke from the beastly BNP types they’d voted for in huge numbers to represent them. As Mr Barnes explained to the local paper, the move was “to prevent the BNP from exerting more influence”, and was “in the best interests of the people of Stoke-on-Trent”. A few months later, in November 2004, the civic-minded and virtuous Councillor Barnes appeared at North Staffordshire Magistrates Court, to face seven different charges relating to child pornography

Labour Councillor and former Mayor (Halton/Cheshire), Liam Temple - Convicted in 2004 of `Inciting a child under 16 to commit an act of gross indecency` after the 58-year old Labour pervert had attempted to molest a 12-year old girl. During the case, the brave youngster told the court via a video link: “He said if I let him touch me he would give me money”.
This Is Cheshire - Ex-Mayor guilty of sex charge

Labour Councillor (Coxhoe/Durham), Les Sheppard – Convicted in 2004 on ten counts of indecent assault on young girls. Jailed for 2 years, and placed on the sex offenders register for 10 years. Teeside Crown Court heard how 71 year old Cllr Sheppard lured his victims into his gold Porsche before driving them to remote spots, where he would submit them to sickening sex attacks. After his arrest, the Labour nonce-case told police “I love women, but you do things which you regret”. Sheppard’s `women` victims were between 9 and 13 years old. The Northern Echo - Wife's anguish at sex attacks on girls

Labour MP (Sheffield/Yorkshire), Clive Betts – Suspended from Parliament for 7 days in 2004, after being caught forging immigration papers to extend the stay of his Brazilian rent-boy gay lover. BBC NEWS | UK | England | South Yorkshire | MP suspended from Commons

Former Labour Councillor (North Yorkshire), Raymond Coates – Charged along with his son Philip Coats in 2003, with child rape, using threats to procure a woman for sex and, wait for it… inciting a woman to have sex with an animal. Coats junior was sentenced to 13 years in prison for his part in the Father & Son rape and bestiality double-act, although the trial of 76-year old Raymond Coats was abandoned after the court ruled he was too ill to stand trial. Agreeing to the indefinite postponement, Judge Paul Hoffman said: “With enormous reluctance, and I emphasise that, enormous reluctance because it is unsatisfactory that these very serious and nasty charges should remain unresolved, I am going to order a stay on this basis. If the evidence were to demonstrate a recovery, the stay can be revoked”. I agreed to have sex with the father of my husband so I wouldn’t lose my son (From York Press)

Labour Councillor (Wokingham/Berkshire), Nelson Bland – Convicted on 16 counts of possession and distribution of hardcore child porn in 2004. Sentenced to community service, placed on the sex offender’s register and ordered to attend rehabilitation classes for paedophiles. Bland used his own teenage daughters computer to hoard his grotesque gallery of child abuse, which was discovered by police during a search of Bland`s home, when they arrested him in connection with the murder of a Nottingham businessman. BBC NEWS | UK | England | Berkshire | Child porn councillor spared jail

Labour Councillor and Mayor-Elect (Merton/London), Sam Chaudry – Due to become Merton’s first Asian Mayor, before he was arrested, tried and convicted of multiple sex attacks on young girls in 1999. One of his victims was a 5-year old.

Labour Mayor (Burnley/Lancashire), Peter Swainston – Convicted of committing `Acts of gross indecency` with another man in a public toilet in 1997. Forced to resign as Mayor, although he remained on the Council. This Is Lancashire - Shamed mayor stands down

Labour Councillor (Halton/Leeds), Lee Benson – Convicted and awaiting sentence in 2005, after pleading guilty on 12 counts of possession of indecent images of children, featuring youngsters between the ages of 5 and 11. Benson, who has a child of his own, repaid the fools who voted for him by storing his revolting kiddie porn collection on the computer provided for him by the council. Benson has been `suspended` - not expelled - by the Labour Party, which means his name remains on the Labour Party membership list, as well as on the sex offenders register. As to which is the more shameful – take your pick!

Labour MP (Rhonda Valley/Wales), Chris Bryant - Poses in his pants on the Internet to advertise himself for casual gay sex encounters. Describes himself as “Horny as buggery” and says, “I'd love a good long ****”. BBC NEWS | UK | Wales | MP 'sorry' over underpants photo

Labour Councillor (Bridgend/South Wales), Iestyn Tudor Davies – Convicted, jailed for 7 years, and placed on the sex offender’s register for life in 2005, for repeatedly raping a 9-year old girl. BBC News | WALES | Councillor jailed for child rape

Labour Councillor (Newham/London), Greg Vincent, who was the Election Agent to Labour MP Tony Banks at the 2001 General Election – Convicted and given a 2-year community rehabilitation order in 2003, for possession of hardcore kiddie porn films and photos, featuring children as young as 8. One of the photos the Labour Councillor found so entertaining, featured – as described in court – a girl aged around 10, naked except for a dog-collar, being assaulted and abused while her hands were tied behind her back around a beam. Vincent was also a School Governor. Adult Male Survivors Of Sexual Abuse ~ AMSOSA UK ~

Prominent Edinburgh Labour party activist and election candidate, Rab Knox - Convicted and jailed for 3 years in 2005 for a horrific sex attack on a woman passenger in his taxi cab. Knox had previously been dubbed Labours “Mr Anti-Sleaze” in Scottish political circles due to his unimpeachable integrity and general all-round saintlyness. Top bloke!

Labour Councillor (North Lincolnshire), David Spooner – Convicted and jailed for 1 year for ************ in front of 2 young boys.

Labour Mayor (Todmordon/West Yorkshire), John Winstanley – Convicted and jailed in 1986 for rape and threats to kill. After raping and threatening to kill his terrified victim, Winstanley then ordered the woman to go on all fours before urinating on her
Labour Party Official (North West England Regional Officer, and parliamentary adviser to the Home Office Minister responsible for crime and policing, Hazel Blears), Peter Tuffley – Convicted and jailed for 15 months and placed on the sex offenders register for 10 years in 2006, for the sexual molestation of a 13-year old boy that he had previously `groomed` on the internet. Tuffley was described as a `rising star` within the Labour Party - which is nothing to be proud of either!

Labour Councillor (Northampton/Northamptonshire), and former School Governor, Alec Dyer-Atkins – Convicted and jailed for 2 years in 2003 for downloading more than 42,000 pictures and films described in court as “Horrifying images of child abuse”. Dyer-Atkins was a member of an international paedophile ring called `The Shadows Brotherhood` which was successfully penetrated following stirling work by Britain's National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU). Commenting on the conviction of the depraved Labour Party beast, NHTCU Deputy Head, Mick Deats said: “This man had some of the worst images on his computers that officers from this unit have ever viewed”. Ex-local councillor gets two years for online child abuse ? The Register

Labour Mayor and Council Leader (Westhoughton/Lancashire), Nicholas Green – Convicted and jailed for 10 years in 1998, for 3 rapes and 13 counts of indecent assault against little girls between the age of 6 and 10. He raped one woman on her wedding day. Leigh Journal - Child rape man jailed

Labour Councillor (Hornchurch/Essex), Alan Prescott, who was also a senior magistrate – Convicted and jailed for 2 years in 2001, for molesting children at the East London care home where he was the superintendent. Prescott, described in court as a “pillar of his local community” admitted carrying out sex attacks on four teenage boys as they slept in their beds. Former councillor jailed for sex abuse | UK news | The Guardian

Prominent Kent Labour Party activist Mark Tann (who has met Tony & Cherie at Party functions) – Convicted and jailed for 15 years in 2002 for sexually assaulting a girl of 9, and raping a 4-year old girl on 2 separate occasions. And no, that’s not a miss-print. She was FOUR YEARS OLD. BBC NEWS | UK | England | Babysitter jailed for rape of toddler

Labour Parliamentary candidate (Cheadle/Cheshire), Paul Diggert – Subject of a 2002 police investigation into the alleged procurement of underage girls for sexual purposes via internet chatrooms. According to the `Sunday Mirror` (3/11/02), Diggert had admitted to having four underage girls that he was `grooming` for sex. In 2004 Diggert was convicted of making and distributing indecent pictures of children. "Paul Diggert - Google Search

Labour Councillor (Westlands/Worcestershire), Keith Rogers – Convicted, fined, and placed on the sex offender’s register in 2003, after downloading over 2,000 hardcore child porn photos on his computer. Worcester News - Town `honour' for child porn councillor

Labour Councillor (Newton Aycliffe/Durham – In Tony Blair's Sedgefield constituency), Martyn Locklin – Convicted on 8 counts of rape and indecent assault on teenage boys in 2001, and jailed for 15 years (reduced to 12 on appeal). Locklin was a top local Party bigwig on first-name terms with Tony Blair, after escorting the PM during visits to his constituency on several occasions. The judge also put the Labour rapist on the sex offender’s register for life, telling him: “You will be watched for the rest of your days. You need to be”. Darlington and Stockton Times - Ex-councillor has sex abuse sentence cut

The above perverts are ones that got caught but it is not unusually for the Labour Party to actively try to cover up the Paedophile activities of its members. Take the case of Labour Party activist, social worker and serial child-molester Mark Trotter. Trotter, who was Hackney’s children’s home manager had been reported to the council on a number of occasions during the 1980’s for child abuse.
However he was protected by his follow party members for years by which time he had infected a number of young boys with AIDS - a condition which he died from in 1995 just as the police net was closing in on him.
And it doesn’t end there!!!

The Paedophile Information exchange

Harriet Harman and the Paedophile Information Exchange


I just came of the phone with someone who was at a Scottish university in 1977. He remembers a motion being put up before the Student Association to affiliate with ‘Paedophile Information Exchange’. Incredibly it was only defeated by the casting vote of the chairman. I was even more astounded to discover that the National Council for Civil Liberties (now known as Liberty) was a backer of both this organisation and ‘Paedophile Action for Liberation’ an offshoot of the ‘Gay Liberation Front’. Various New Labour figures including Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt were involved with these movements in one way or another. Dromey was on the executive committee of NCCL when the paedophile groups were affiliated. Hewitt was General Secretary. Harman was legal officer of NCCL and complicit in attempts to weaken legislation against child pornography. Apparently, at the time, the NCCL Gay Rights sub-committee was packed full of paedophile activists. A quick online search for ‘Harriet Harman Paedophile Information Exchange’ confirms the facts. Perhaps everyone knows about this? I was out of the country when this Telegraph article was published. It is amazing what sort of agendas are lurking so lightly concealed below the surface of British politics. More detailed information here.

Labour figures' bizarre link to paedophile groups

Paedophile information exchange...

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Moira Anderson: Goverment cover-up....

Counteract: Justice for 250.000...background informtaion for the book which may now be read online...

Crimes reported and evidence offered...

The Appalling Vista – the fight back against Operation Ore.....the book can now be read online.

Operation SLEDGEHAMMER'S fuse still sizzling...

Operation Ore flawed by fraud....

Judge hits police with massive bill over false Operation Ore charges

Monday, April 18, 2011

Operation Ore was based on flawed evidence from the start

The police memoranda show that within months of the operation launching in April 2002, detectives who forensically examined computers taken from suspects' homes in dawn raids found files showing that the main evidence used in Operation Ore was wrong. The evidence, it was claimed, showed that over 7,000 British-based subscribers had purchased access to child pornography websites.

At a national police conference held in a Pimlico hotel in February 2003, local police forces warned that claims made by the National Crime Squad (NCS), in control of the operation, had gone "pear-shaped".

According to a former detective inspector and computer forensic specialist who led an Operation Ore team in the north of England, police forces throughout the UK had been "assured from the outset" that it was not possible to subscribe to websites run by a Texas web gateway company, Landslide Inc, without clicking on and agreeing to a "Click Here Child Porn" banner on the "the home page of".

The NCS, he said in a report of the February meeting, were adamant that "it was not possible to enter any websites through the Landslide gateway without going through this procedure and making deliberate choices".

But after examining seized computers and looking at browser history records, two UK police forces told the meeting that the files found showed that "it was possible to ... pay for material ... without making any choices at all and without any warnings that paedophile material was available."

The forensic specialist added: "This has thrown the whole issue of incitement charges into question... I am of the opinion that in those cases where no images have been found ... there is insufficient evidence to proceed ... The NCS and CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] are looking at these issues as a matter of urgency and will be sending out advice in due course," he reported.

At a second meeting in Birmingham in March 2003, NCS retracted two claims it had made about child porn websites. The former DI alerted senior officers and colleagues that "this has serious implications ... [It] is yet another weakness in the NCS investigation which has only just come to light, with obvious consequences. I have serious doubts about the quality and integrity of the evidence supplied by the NCS and will be raising these concerns in the relevant quarter."

Former Merseyside police officer Peter Johnston said he was also concerned about claims in Operation Ore. "I ... asked ... can we have the evidence, can we see the credit card details, can we see the statements ... from the people who recovered this?”

Johnson's requests were turned down, he told ITN in a broadcast interview. He was told "it wasn’t relevant ... we have 7,500 people here ... they must be guilty, let's get out there and get them locked up".

No investigations took place. No advice was sent to police forces about the flaws in the "Click Here Child Porn" claim. Although the real front page of the Landslide website was included in an obscure part of the evidence bundle, it was described as a "front screen" while the fake front page was highlighted and described as the "front page". This sleight of hand meant that the false "front page" was always referred to at the start of court cases, thus purporting to prove that subscribers could only subscribe to Landslide sites for illegal purposes.

CEOP (Child Exploitation and Online Protection), a quasi policy agency, took over Operation Ore in 2006. The Home Office has announced that CEOP will be disbanded later this year.

The former director of CEOP who presided over Operation Ore, James Gamble, retired in October 2010 after disputes with Home Secretary Teresa May, which continue.

Operation Ore police raids continued until 2008. It was not until 2010 that CEOP computer expert Dr Nick Sharples testified in an appeal case that subscribers to Landslide websites could not have seen the "Click Here Child Porn" banner and that it was not part of the Landslide website.

CEOP has refused to comment on his evidence, claiming to The Register that a transcript "should be available" on the internet. It isn't. CEOP said: "We will not be making any further comments on this operation or its various investigations unless required to do so by a court of law or a law enforcement organisation."

The CPS told The Register that it could not provide any record that the mistake had been investigated or corrected.

The Register: Read the full Story
07 Apr 2011 by OBU